DENNIS DOOLEY, Author and Biographer
1986 CLEVELAND ARTS PRIZE FOR LITERATURE
Dennis J. Dooley, the second of six sons of Avis McMullin, a talented portrait painter of 1930s celebrities, and Tom Dooley, a Ben Day artist employed by the Chicago Tribune,
believed he had found his calling at the age of 13 in the form of the
original comic strips he and his brothers wrote and illustrated for
their hand-printed Dooley Trib.
“As soon as everybody had ‘drawn in’ the latest installment of his strip,” he remembers, “somebody would yell ‘Published!’
and we would squeeze onto the davenport, where the continuing
adventures of our Dick Tracy knock-offs were read aloud—along with
short, irreverent articles about the neighbors—while all eyes moved in
unison from one panel to the next. I remember when we passed the
1,000th issue.”
In a curious foreshadowing of
things to come, Dennis named his detective Sam Spade, after the famous
fictional gumshoe whose exploits he, born into a pre-television world
on December 31, 1942, had avidly followed on the kitchen radio.
Dooley’s more considered reflections on how Spade’s creator, Samuel
Dashiell Hammett, anticipated key 20th-century ethical issues in The Maltese Falcon, The Thin Man and Red Harvest—novels more typically celebrated for their hard-boiled prose—won the Cleveland Arts Prize in Literature in 1986.
Stints
at college (Chicago’s Loyola University; its Rome, Italy, campus; and
Indiana University) alternated with jobs working in an envelope factory
and a community theater, driving a bread truck and reporting for a
small-town daily in northern Indiana while Dooley pursued advanced but
largely self-directed studies in linguistics, art history, opera and
classical music—the vast output, in particular, of Mozart. He
co-founded and edited a journal of contemporary poetry, Obscurity and a Penny.
Dooley’s passionate interest in the arts and humanities would influence
the entire course of his adult life, compelling him time and again to
set aside his aspirations to write fiction in favor of pursuing other
forms of inquiry into the human condition. Along the way he mastered a
host of other genres.
As a
doctoral fellow he delved into medieval languages and literature at
Indiana University, where he adapted stories by Zora Neale Hurston and
Arna Bontemps, among other distinguished African-American writers, for
the college’s Black Theatre Workshop. (His full-length dramatization of
Eldridge Cleaver’s prison memoir Soul on Ice was performed on
IU’s main stage with an original musical score by composer/former jazz
cellist Dave Baker.) In 1969 Dooley was recruited to the faculty of
Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. Winning a reputation as a
fascinating lecturer almost as soon as he arrived on campus, he taught,
besides Chaucer, the department’s first seminars on gender studies and
the development of “self” consciousness in literature. The
over-enrollment of his course on the contemporary American novel forced
it to be moved to the university’s Hatch Auditorium, and his class on
the American language was one of two CWRU courses highlighted in The Underground Guide to the College of Your Choice (New American Library/Signet Books) in 1971.
While at CWRU, Dooley became a founding editor of bits, a national quarterly whose name derived from its 6 3/8-inch by 4 5/8-inch format. Devoted to the short poem, bits featured new work by such award-winning poets as John Updike, Mary
Oliver and Howard Nemerov. Dooley’s own poetry and translations
appeared in several national journals.
Increasingly
drawn to the societal issues that had emerged during the turbulent
Sixties and restless to be part of the action, Dooley left academia in
1971 to join the think tank of an on-site project exploring ways to
make institutional space and settings in a long-term mental hospital
more conducive to healthy human interactions. Cleveland Magazine published
his two-part article on conditions in mental health care, launching
Dooley’s new career as a journalist. In 1974 he was named an
associate editor of the city magazine, where he added solid reportorial
skills to his already enviable talents as a prose writer and created
the magazine’s Lively Arts section.
In 1980 he became a co-founder, with two other ex-Cleveland Magazine staffers, of Northern Ohio LIVE, a
regional arts and entertainment magazine that set new standards of
sophistication and thoroughness in arts coverage that other local media
soon began to emulate. Dooley’s profile of Christoph von
Dohnányi, then still living in Hamburg, was the first extended
backgrounder on the Cleveland Orchestra’s newly named director to
appear anywhere. The 6,000-word story, researched and written on
deadline, is still regarded as the definitive piece on the maestro’s
pre-Cleveland years. Dooley’s in-depth look at the (hitherto
unacknowledged) problems of Cleveland Ballet was credited with sparking
the reform effort that bought another 17 years of life for that
struggling institution—and led to his recruitment by The Cleveland
Foundation, America’s second largest community trust. During this
period Dooley became involved with the City Club of Cleveland, serving
an unprecedented three terms as the club’s unpaid program chair at the
request of three City Club presidents. Elected president in 1988, he
had the honor of introducing the thought-provoking speakers featured
each week in national broadcasts of the nation’s longest continually
operating forum for free speech and the exchange of ideas.
Dooley’s first book, Dashiell Hammett,
was commissioned by an editor at New York’s Frederick Ungar Publishing
Company he’d met at an anti-war rally in Washington, D.C., who invited
the Clevelander to write a book-length criticism of the work of
Dashiell Hammett for a series called “Recognitions”. He wasn't
interested in a dry scholarly treatise or a straight biography, Dick
Riley said, but was looking instead for an engaging “take” on Hammett’s
place in the history of detective fiction that students and the general
public could read as a companion to the classic novels, which had just
been re-released in paperback. “I’d never actually read any of
Hammett’s books,” Dooley now confesses, “and knew of his heroes (Nick
and Nora Charles, the Continental Op and Sam Spade) only from the TV
and radio adaptations, but I was curious about what kind of detective
stories a man who had lived with Lillian Hellman and gone to prison for
refusing to cooperate with the House Un-American Activities Committee
would write.”
Dooley also
recognized that the assignment offered a chance to exercise at greater
length the authentic voice he was developing as a magazine journalist,
and to apply the critical-thinking skills acquired during his previous
life as a medievalist to his own century’s popular culture. Published
in 1984, Dooley’s Dashiell Hammett is a provocative and
highly readable examination (see excerpt) of how popular culture can
reveal the soul of an author—and of his era. “Dooley writes
interestingly of the times that produced the short stories. . . ,” said The Plain Dealer, “stories that Raymond Chandler wrote would be worth reading even if the last page was missing.” Eugenia Thornton Silver, the editor of Marginal Notes, a
review of books published by the Cleveland Public Library, and chair of
the Cleveland Arts Prize literature jury, found Dooley’s book “full of
fresh, uninhibited insights into the work of a master” and the “best
study yet of the writer who is, to me at least, still king of American
thriller writers.”
Dooley’s next book project, Superman at Fifty: The Persistence of a Legend (Octavia Press, 1987; Macmillan, 1988), would explore the enduring
popularity of that pop culture figure and what he says about the
worldview of American youth and adults. “Among other things,” says
Dooley, “he embodies the American dilemma—the limits imposed on nearly
absolute power by human and democratic values.” Modeled on an academic
tradition known as a “Festschrift,” and co-edited by Cleveland State
University English professor Gary Engle, Superman at Fifty was
a collection of essays, by local authorities in various fields,
honoring Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, the two Cleveland schoolboys who
had created the character and legend of the Man of Steel back in the
1930s. Dooley’s lead essay, the longest in the book, was an expansion
of an article he had researched and written for Cleveland Magazine in the Seventies that uncovered the sources and inspiration for the
characters and premises of the original Superman stories. The book was
hailed by TIME magazine in a June 1988 cover story for its insights and original reporting and favorably reviewed by the New York Times, Variety and Omni magazine, among other national publications.
As
producer for ideas and culture (1991–1996) at WCPN-FM 90.3, Cleveland’s
public radio station, Dooley continued his exploration of the minds and
work of creative people. During his five years at the station he
interviewed such original thinkers as humanitarian and former U.S.
president Jimmy Carter, children’s author Maurice Sendak, mystery
writers Sarah Paretsky and Sue Grafton, monologist Spalding Grey and
Sister Helen Prejean, the “death row nun.” Dooley won or participated
in 20 national and regional awards honoring excellence in broadcast
journalism, including the first national First Place ever won by WCPN.
His award-winning pieces bore such intriguing titles as “Mozart’s Last
Summer,” “Stages of Freedom: The Cleveland Play House in Prague,” “Bix:
The Miraculous Year” and “Babar, or The Relevance of Elephants.”
Working
as an independent communications consultant since 1990, Dooley has
produced strategic materials, grant proposals, presentations and white
papers for dozens of not-for-profit organizations throughout Greater
Cleveland and for the Urban Institute in Washington, D.C. He is
particularly valued for his ability to help his clients explore their
underlying values and assumptions, extract valuable ideas from
discussions and presentations and make a case for support. Dooley’s
writing for the Cleveland Cultural Coalition about the impact of arts
and culture on the local economy was the first attempt to pull together
and lay out the information that eventually became a keystone of the
successful effort to secure taxpayer funding for the arts in Cleveland
and Cuyahoga County.
Other major projects on which he has been a principal writer include Connecting Cleveland: The 2020 Citywide Plan; the City of Cleveland’s proposal for an Empowerment Zone, a competitive
federal program that awarded Cleveland more than $177 million in
development monies; and the Report and Recommendations of the Cleveland Foundation Commission on Poverty,
which “provided the intellectual basis,” according to U.S. Senator
Barbara Mikulski, for HOPE VI, a $6 billion U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development initiative that tied the physical rethinking of
public housing to on-site, resident-shaped programs designed to
re-build healthy community relationships while addressing the range of
challenges faced by resident families and creating opportunities to
better their situations.
Throughout his career Dooley has sought to bring recognition to the work of others. As Cleveland Magazine’s
theater critic, he conceived and co-founded the Cleveland Critics
Circle to recognize and nurture excellence in area professional and
community theater at a time when, for most Greater Clevelanders, local
“theater” meant the offerings of the Cleveland Play House. One of the
Circle’s awards for Best Performance by an Actor went to an exciting
young actor in the Great Lakes Shakespeare Festival production of Two Gentlemen of Verona by
the name of Tom Hanks. (It is still cited in Hanks’s resume.) Over the years Dooley has participated on the
award juries of the Cleveland Arts Prize, the City Club Hall of Fame,
the Irish American Archives Society’s Walks of Life Awards and the
Awards of Achievement of the now-defunct Northern Ohio LIVE.
The commendations he has authored for the organizations’ recognition
ceremonies have brought public attention to dozens of extraordinary
individuals and initiatives. His thoughtful profiles of more than 90
past winners of the Cleveland Arts Prize are included in this archive.
“I
have discovered that I enjoy trying to sum up someone’s distinctive
contribution,” Dooley says. “It must have been something I learned from
the thousand Irish wakes I attended while growing up: the importance of
taking stock of a life and conveying to others how that person has
enriched our lives.”
—Diana Tittle
|
|
“a man so thin he had to stand in the same place twice to cast a shadow”
The
author gives the distinct impression that Nick Charles is running away
from something. And the only thing that seems clear is that it has to
do with his past—his other life as a detective. Is it his inability to
deal with his current inactivity—the loafer’s life he has always
thought he wanted—in contrast with the life-or-death excitement, or
even just the honest work, of his past? Is the reader seeing Hammett’s
celebrated proletarian hero, who has been described as the
quintessential “job-holder,” cut off from the life-giving force of
honest labor? Maybe, though Hammett stops just short of bringing the
issue to a boil.
But the very point at which this novel
becomes the most frustrating is also the point at which it becomes the
most fascinating. For Hammett has left what seems to be an ingenious
trail of clues so structural in nature as to be nearly subliminal—and
from the very first pages of the book. Nick Charles is a man not only
cut off from, but pursued by his past. Hammett’s decision to begin his
story at the moment he does is highly significant in this regard. It is
the moment in which a person from Nick’s past—more specifically, from
his old life—suddenly enters his new life, bringing with her a whole
network of old entanglements: an old affair with her mother, an old
case of Nick’s which was never solved, and the whole cast of characters
connected with it . . . the past, in short, as unfinished business. . .
.
The fact that Hammett makes so much of Nick’s resisting
a return to his past life as a detective—even as he is sucked into a
sinister new plot involving a cast of characters from the life Nick has
thought he left behind—suggests we may be on the right track here. . .
. But there is another theme interwoven with the first. And it has to
do with who Nick really is. “Aren’t you Nick Charles?” Dorothy asks him
on the first page of the novel, coming up to him at the bar. “Yes,”
Nick unthinkingly answers. But she soon presses her point, one that
unsettles him; for she means Nick Charles, the detective—an identity
that Nick has forsaken and keeps insisting is not him anymore. The
later reference to his father’s original name, Charalambides, is very
much to the point: Nick’s father had shed an older identity and become
someone else. And Nora later calls Nick by that name in an intimate
moment, suggesting that he too is someone other than who he pretends to
be. Indeed, Nick’s reasons for turning his back on his former identity
as a detective are not so dissimilar from his father’s in sacrificing
his old name willingly for the opportunity of gaining admittance to
America with all its plenty and its promise of a good life. The
shadow that has fallen over Nick’s life is that of time itself: the
inescapable past with its uncomfortable echoes of old aspirations and
uneasy compromises, its unfinished business and its unanswered
questions. One of those questions, says Malcolm Cowley, is frequently,
as one grows older, who was I and why did I do what I did and not do
certain other things?” The difficult part about trying to answer such
questions is that one’s sense of what actually happened changes. It is
in this regard that people out of one’s past can be fascinating, in a
morbid sort of way, like time travelers bringing news of a forgotten or
as yet unknown era. —Dashiell Hammett (Frederick Ungar, 1984)
|